Site Sponsor:

mcafee_logo.gif
line

Now Available:

Featured Resource:

line

Newsletter

Email Address:


line

Ask the Expert

Have a question for our resident expert? Email your questions to Dan or post a comment to the blog.

« Web Application Policy Frameworks | Main | Improving Security of Online Transactions »

Simplify Vista and Office Deployments - Or Try a Better Option

Microsoft released the Business Desktop Deployment 2007 tool to help the many sys admins scratching their heads about Vista installations. While I've argued for better system administration tools as a means to reduce vulnerabilities and improve security, I see the BDD 2007 as a glass half full/half empty situation.

The fundamental problem is that managing Vista is more complex than previous versions of Windows. The maybe due, in part, to better security, but I'm not sure the tactical improvements in the kernel, user access control, etc. out weigh the strategic mistakes of yet another over-featured operating system installed on difficult to protect clients.

Part of the problem we have with security is architecture. We have a large number of computing devices with capable processors, lots of storage, high-bandwidth network connection, and lousy to decent security profiles. We then load these up with lots of software, each with their own vulnerabilities, and tell system administrators and network managers to keep it all locked down, in compliance and constantly available. Why do keep digging our own graves?

A better solution is on the horizon: virtual PCs running on high-end, centrally managed servers running Web-based applications. We have virutalized systems now with VMWare, Parrallels, and Xen. We even have a wide array of software appliance with complete application stacks for content management, databases, app/web servers, networking, and even security appliances from VMWare's Virtual Appliance Marketplace. These options optimize hardware use while still leaving us the option of running what ever OS we want to use. (I've used VMWare on Windows and I just started testing Parallels on Mac OS X).

When we don't need full blown virutalized PCs, Web operating systems like eyeOS and YouOS might fit the bill. The idea behind these applications is that much of the functionality we need can be made available through a browser. This is obvious now, just look at ThinkFree, Google Docs and Spreadsheets, and Yahoo Widgets, not to mention all the enterprise apps available through browsers.

Some combination of WebOS, browser-based apps and mashups is a better future than another round of massive upgrades, deployment headaches, and OS activation bookkeeping. And, oh yea, it will be easier to secure.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.realtime-websecurity.com/type/mt-tb.cgi/218

Post a comment

(All comments are approved by site leader before appearing here. Thanks for commenting!)

line

Dan Sullivan's Bio:

Dan Sullivan is a systems architect with 20 years of IT experience that includes engagements in enterprise security, application design, and systems architecture. His experience includes a broad range of industries, including financial services, manufacturing, government, retail, gas and oil production, power generation, and education. Dan’s security-related project work has ranged from requirements analysis for enterprise information security to designing and implementing security for database applications and enterprise portals. Dan has written about information security and other enterprise information management topics for Business Security Advisor, DM Review, Intelligent Enterprise, and E-Business Advisor. You can contact Dan at: dan_sullivan@realtimepublishers.net